Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wisner v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2022No. 21AP-494Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Wisner v. Indus. Comm.,

2022-Ohio-3441.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Justin M. Wisner, : Relator, : No. 21AP-494 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : Respondents. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 29, 2022 On brief: Nager, Romaine & Schneiberg Co., LPA, Colter J. McArdle, and Catherine Lietzke, for relator. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, and David M. Canale, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. IN MANDAMUS JAMISON, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Justin M. Wisner, seeks a writ of mandamus from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API