Legal Opinion

Peiffer v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. 99C-18990; A115146Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 P.3d 1273 (2003)

186 Or. App. 485

Sharon L. PEIFFER, Appellant,

v.

Sonia E. HOYT, Superintendent, Oregon Women's Correctional Facility, Respondent.

99C-18990; A115146.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 23, 2002.

Decided February 19, 2003.

Sara Dean Cromwell argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Melinda M. Buel.

Kathleen Cegla, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG, LINDER,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API