Legal Opinion

In re Glen Salt Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by George 0. Otis and others from an order - of the Supreme Court, made at the Cliemung Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chemung on the 10th day of February, 1897, adjudging that 'on the 26th day ,of May, 1896, Walter H. Bradley was and had been for more than ten days prior-thereto the owner of certain 150 shares of stock in the Glen Salt Company transferred to him by the Bradley Salt Company and was: entitled to vote upon such…

Read the full summary

Appeal by George 0. Otis and others from an order - of the Supreme Court, made at the Cliemung Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chemung on the 10th day of February, 1897, adjudging that 'on the 26th day ,of May, 1896, Walter H. Bradley was and had been for more than ten days prior-thereto the owner of certain 150 shares of stock in the Glen Salt Company transferred to him by the Bradley Salt Company and was: entitled to vote upon such shares at the election of directors held on the 26th of May, 1896 ; also, adjudging that George G. Otis was not the owner of…

1Opinion of the Court

Merwin, J.:

The appellants -claim that the injunction orders were not before the court for determination, and that, therefore, the orders made in *239the actions should he reversed. By the stipulation made and notice given at the election, which are above set forth, it is clear that botli parties then intended that both injunctions should be passed upon .if possible. The stipulation is that “ review of the entire proceedings should then be haa as provided by statute,” and the notice given was “ for the purpose of reviewing both proceedings and the election in general.” By the statute (§ 27 of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Matter of Petition of Argus Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Root v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Chemical National Bank v. ColwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairmont Foods Company v. ManganelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. In re the Election of Directors of Utica Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Mannheimer v. KeehnNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Galibert v. J. C. Hoffman, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In re Set Aside the Elections of Directors of RinglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API