State v. Newman
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge Pro Tem.
Stephen Donald Newman appeals from his judgment of conviction for attempted rape. Specifically, Newman challenges the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The following facts were revealed through testimony at the suppression hearings and set forth by the district court in its order denying Newman’s motion to suppress. Late one summer night, police were dispatched to a grocery store parking lot to investigate a report of suspicious activity at a nearby city park. The police were met at the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Jose Perez-JungoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. LIECHTYIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Henry Roy LomanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Conrad Walter PetersenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.