Legal Opinion
State v. LIECHTY
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 6, 2011No. 38083PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELANSON, Judge.
The State of Idaho appeals from the district court’s order granting Troy Edwin Liechty’s motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The following facts were revealed at the hearing on the motion to suppress. On the morning of March 15, 2010, a patrol officer observed a vehicle parked along the side of the road in a dirt lot. The vehicle, which belonged to Liechty, was facing a canal and the backyards of neighborhood homes. Concerned about the location of the vehicle in relation to the homes, the officer pulled his patrol ear into the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LIECHTYIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Matthew Elliot CohaganIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Taylor James FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016