Legal Opinion

Worth James Construction Co. v. Jacksonville Water Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1979No. 79-278PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a suit by the appellant, Worth James Construction Company, to enjoin the Jacksonville Water Commission from awarding a construction contract to S & S Construction Company (also a defendant). Worth James contends that it should be awarded the contract,, because it was admittedly the low bidder among the six contractors bidding for the job. The chancellor denied relief on several grounds, one of them being that Worth James has no standing to sue and another that the Commission was justified, in the city’s best interest, in not awarding the contract to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Bank of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Arkansas Democrat Co. v. Press Printing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Street Improvement District No. 130 of Hot Springs v. CrockettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Conway Corp. v. Construction Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. L & H Sanitation, Inc. v. Lake City Sanitation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. L & H SANITATION, INC. v. Lake City Sanitation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API