Legal Opinion

Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Bank of Forrest City

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Francis Circuit Court; Hance N. Hutton, Judge; The paper submitted by appellee makes no definite proposition, and could not alone be the basis of a contract.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Francis Circuit Court; Hance N. Hutton, Judge; The paper submitted by appellee makes no definite proposition, and could not alone be the basis of a contract. The law contemplates definite bids, which, together with the acceptance will amount to a contract, without reference to an)^ -other bid or thing. 11 111. 254. 1. Appellant has proceeded upon the erroneous theory that because it was a bidder at the offering it was the party aggrieved, and, without having made application to be made a party and having such application granted, either directly or indirectly, that it…

1Opinion of the CourtFrauRnthar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court affirming an order of the county court of St. Francis County selecting the Bank of Forrest City as the depository of all the public funds of said county. This order was made in pursuance of an act of the Legislature approved March 9, 1909, entitled “An act to provide a depository for the county funds of * * * St. Francis * * * counties” (Acts of 1909, p. 150). By said act it is provided that it shall be the duty of the county court of said county at a specified term, and at the same term every two years thereafter, to receive propositions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Belden v. Contracting BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Webster v. FrenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Anderson v. Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Phelan v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Arkansas Democrat Co. v. Press Printing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Conway Corp. v. Construction Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Casey v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Worth James Construction Co. v. Jacksonville Water CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API