Legal Opinion

Braden v. Perkins

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

This motion is made by the defendant Newbold to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action against him. The complaint sets forth certain causes of action in tort based on the alleged wrongful inducement of the breach of a contract which the plaintiff had with William H. Newbold Son <fc Company, a copartnership of which the moving defendant was and now is a partner. The question presented is whether the moving defendant can be held hable in a tort action for inducing a breach of contract by the partnership of which he was a member.

It is well settled that a director or officer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Knapp v. PenfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bob v. HecksherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Savage is Loose Co. v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  3. Gulickson v. ForestDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  4. Ford v. C. E. Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Northmon Investment Co. v. Milford Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API