Legal Opinion

Fleahman v. Lehman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1986No. C2-85-2223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant Clifford Fleahman’s motion for a new trial after an adverse special verdict in an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Appellant contends the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the emergency rule and that the jury verdict awarding him no damages was perverse because the evidence conclusively established that he suffered permanent injuries as a result of the accident. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

At about 5:30 p.m. on December 7, 1980, appellant was riding in a car driven by his son, respondent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Otterness v. HorsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Lee v. ZaskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Templin v. Crestliner, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Carnahan v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API