Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Buckman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1987No. C5-87-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Harold Buckman appeals from a judgment holding him responsible for all of Mark Schneider’s damages, including those caused by the negligence of respondent Pam Laska (formerly Buckman).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
FACTS
On May 9, 1976, Mark Schneider was hang-gliding and fell about 250 feet. He sustained two broken ankles and fractured his spine. Schneider was transferred on a backboard by the Buckman-Schierts ambulance from the scene to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wabasha.
Upon arrival in the emergency room, a doctor determined Schneider’s injuries were serious…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. ChilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schneider v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Carlson v. City of Broken ArrowCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Schneider v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988