Legal Opinion

Roehm A. West v. The H. K. Ferguson Company, a Corporation, and MacCo Corporation, a Corporation, a Joint Venture and Callery Chemical Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1967No. 8790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order fixing and determining an attorney fee after the filing of the statutory lien notice in the litigation wherein such fee is claimed on a quantum meruit basis. After an evidentiary hearing the trial judge made adequate and complete findings of fact and, as we view the case, the only substantial question here concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support those findings. Appellant is the attorney, who seeks a fee higher than that allowed in the trial court and appellee is the litigant from whom the fee is sought.

The facts surrounding the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Pepsi--Cola Bottling Company of Salina, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Eve v. Hegler, and the Arkansas Teachers Association, Inc. v. The Board of Education of the Bearden School District, Bearden, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. First Central Service Corp. v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Western Fidelity Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API