Legal Opinion
First Central Service Corp. v. Mountain Bell Telephone
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1981No. 4826PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Through legal proceedings, First Central Service Corporation and Dona Ana Inns, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, obtained possession of Las Cruces Inn, not a party to this action, the telephone number of which was 524-3671. First Central wanted continued and uninterrupted service of this telephone number. Mountain Bell claimed a prior indebtedness of Las Cruces Inn in the amount of $5,581.00 for service rendered this telephone number. It agreed to continue the service under this telephone number if the prior bill were paid, or if the bill were not paid, it would render…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Lawrence D. Shehi, D/B/A Shehi Transfer and Storage v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Price v. South Central BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Thomas F. Carter and Carter Electronics Corporation v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Thomas F. Carter and Carter Electronics Corporation v. Honorable Joe E. Estes, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Smith v. Southern Union Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Grindsted Products, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Attorney General v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Rates and Charges of US WestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.