Legal Opinion

Arrow Chemical Corporation v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1965No. 16494, 16526PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

These two appeals, closely interrelated, are from two separate , judgments, both granting and denying temporary injunctions and flowing from an original cause of action. Arrow Chemical Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Arrow”) instituted this suit originally in the district court against William E. Anderson (hereinafter referred to as “Anderson”), Maurice A. Tharp, Jr. (hereinafter referred to as “Tharp”) and Anko Products Company of Texas, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Anko”). Basically Arrow’s suit was for a temporary injunction to enforce a noncompetitive…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Bells v. Greater Texoma Utility Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Waggener v. WaggenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Collins v. GladdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Norris of Houston, Inc. v. GafasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Moody's Quality Meats, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API