Legal Opinion

Haag v. Deter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1906No. 20,879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Wabash Circuit Court; A. H. Plummer, Judge. Action by Melissa Deter against Henry M. Haag and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, said Haag appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Per curiam

In the court below appellee recovered a joint judgment against appellant and one Enyart, and from *127said judgment appellant seeks to prosecute a vacation appeal. Notice has been served on Enyart, but he has not been named as a party in the assignment of errors. Appellee makes this point, and insists on a dismissal of the appeal. Rule six of this court requires that “the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of all the parties,” and under the settled practice this appeal must be dismissed. Elliott, App. Proc., §323; Ewbank’s Manual, §126.

It is so ordered.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarkson v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Antioch Baptist Church v. MortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916