Clarkson v. Wood
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Montgomery Circuit Court; Jem West, Judge. Drainage petition by Walter S. Clarkson, against which William H. Wood and others remonstrate. From a judgment for remonstrators, petitioner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
Under the drainage act of 1885 (Acts 1885, p. 129, §1, §5622 Burns 1901) as amended in 1903 *583(Acts 1903, p. 504) commonly known as the circuit court act, appellant began this proceeding for the construction of a drain. In due season certain owners of land affected by the proposed drain filed a remonstrance in these words:
“The undersigned landowners, whose lands are reported as affected, respectfully remonstrate against the report of the drainage commissioners herein, for the following reasons: * * * Third. That it will not be practicable to accomplish the proposed drainage without an expense…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Robinson v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Bass v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Crume v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shields v. PylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Underhill v. FranzIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Drinkwatter v. EikenberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co. v. Ft. Wayne & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Sharp v. EatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.