Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hill-Shaw Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 2, 1941No. 7288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in a personal injury suit, notwithstanding a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding her entitled to $19,566.66 damages.

The action was brought to recover for injuries sustained when a glass coffee maker filled with boiling water and coffee broke, badly burning appellant. The complaint charged negligence in the construction and manufacture of the coffee maker,1 and appellant relied upon the doc*683trine of res ipsa loquitur to sustain its charge of negligence.

At the time the accident occurred, March 18, 1937,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Statler v. George A. Ray Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Reed & Barton Corporation v. MaasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  5. Riecke v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honea v. City Dairy, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lynch v. Galler Seven-Up Pre-Mix Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Honea v. City Dairy, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API