Legal Opinion

Julius Restaurant, Inc. v. Lombardi

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Relying upon section 964 of the Penal Law, the petitioner seeks an injunction restraining the respondent from using the name of “ Julius ” in the operation of his restaurant business.

At the outset it is interesting to note that this proceeding is perhaps the first to be brought to trial under the above-mentioned section. The Court of Appeals (282 N. Y. 126) has determined that an application for an injunction under this section may be instituted by a notice of motion and petition, thus eliminating the necessity of pleadings.

The novelty of the matter demands a critical study of the intent of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Julius Restaurant v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overseas News Agency, Inc. v. Overseas Press, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fainblatt v. Leo Sportswear Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Layco Auto Seat Cover Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Agash Refining Corp. v. Abraham GashNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API