Legal Opinion

Robinette v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, and dismissing,’the petition as amended.

Briefly stated the facts pleaded are these: The railway company operates a line of railroad through Pike county. On August 9, 1930, Robinette was in its employ and was engaged in loading ties into one of its cars. The ties were heavy and it was necessary for him to raise them above his head. The labor of loading them was strenuous, and caused his hands and body to perspire freely. The ties had been soaked in creosote or other poisonous substance, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Hines v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowler v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Watkins v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Dowler v. NY, C. & ST. LRR CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Dowler v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. RobinetteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API