Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 21, 1919PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeals from Franklin Circuit Court (Two Cases).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming one and reversing the oilier.

On July 6 and 7, 1916, Winford Wriglit, employed as a section band for the L. & N. R. R. Co., at the direction of tlie section boss, helped unload, at Jett Station, ties that bad been treated with creosote oil.

In the following March he filed the first of these actions to recover for injuries alleged to have-been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence in failing to warn him of the danger in handling such ties, which work he alleged was dangerous to his health and person, of which defendant knew or ought to have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Lyttle v. Harlan Town Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Anshutz v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Ky. Heating Co. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Pinkley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hines v. SweeneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Dowler v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Eller v. Paul Revere Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cash's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Leonard v. Enterprise Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API