Camerlin v. Starr
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.
This action arose out of a two car collision at an intersection. Alberta Camerlin sued for personal injuries, and Vincent, her husband, joined in the action claiming damages to personal property, expenses and loss of services. There was a verdict by a jury for Alberta Camerlin for $7,500.00, and for Vincent Camerlin for $2,500.00. Judgment was rendered on the verdict. Motion for new trial grounded upon excessiveness of the verdict and error in the trial was overruled by the trial judge, who considered the same seriously and rendered a written opinion on each of the grounds of the motion. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maggio v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Cleveland Railway Co. v. KozlowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Macci v. AldredMercer County Court of Common Pleas · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. KnippOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Richards v. Office Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jarvis v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Baltus v. Von Der LippeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972