Legal Opinion
Stamicarbon, N.V. v. McNally-Pittsburg Manufacturing Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1969No. Civ. A. No. KC-2399PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
TEMPLAR, District Judge.
This action was instituted in September, 1965, by the plaintiff, in which it complains that a patent originally granted to one Robert Zaborowski on March 6, 1962, and assigned to plaintiff by proper document in the United States Patent Office, had been and was being infringed by defendant.
The patent consists of a flowsheet description of a “process for separating particles of solid material according to specific gravity” in the manner specifically described in the patent.
A problem presented to the mining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Griswold v. Oil Capital Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Conmar Products Corporation v. TibonyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richard E. Self v. Fisher Controls Company, Inc., and Control Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977