Broz v. State

ON REHEARING

December 20, 1922.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant insists that in upholding the ruling of the trial court in admiting the testimony relating to the conversation between the appellant and the officers who found the still in his house, this court was in error.

The sheriff testified that he, in company with other officers, went to appellant’s place of residence, and on the way, about three hundred yards from his_ home, they met and overtook him. The officers slacked up their conveyance, which was an automobile, and one of them said to the appellant: “Get in, Jim,” and he got in the…