Fry v. Rookwood Pottery
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
BU RTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a bill to restrain infringement of patent No. 399,020, of March 5, 1889, granted to Laura A. Pry for an “improvement in the art of decorating pottery ware.” The answer denied novelty, and averred that the improvement had been described in printed publications prior to the alleged invention of the complainant, in a patent to B. Walkup, of May 6, 1881, a patent to A. Peeler, of April 25, 1882, in the life of Josiah Wedgewood, in the “History of the Ceramic Art,” and in other publications; and that the process had been known and in public use prior to complainant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Palmer v. John E. Brown Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
- Steiner Fire Extinguisher Co. v. City of AdrianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Fry v. Rookwood Pottery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weir Frog Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Lionne Co. v. Cushiwan-Hollis Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1924