Lionne Co. v. Cushiwan-Hollis Co.
District Court, D. Maine
In Equity. Suit by the Dionne Company against the CushmanHollis Company.
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity, charging infringement of a patent, and seeking an injunction, an accounting, and damages. The patent, No. 1,339,462, was granted by the Patent Office May 11, 1920, on an application filed by one Ernest Dionne July 5, 1918. The title of the plaintiff corporation is admitted. The alleged invention is a process of protecting shoes from soiling during manufacture. At the trial the plaintiff relied on claims 1 and 12.
[ 1 ] Claim 12 is stated by counsel for the plaintiff to be the process, and claim 1 its expression in an article of manufacture.
Claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Emerson & Norris Co. v. Simpson Bros. Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1913
- In re BraseltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Fry v. Rookwood Pottery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lionne Co. v. Cushman-Hollis Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925