Legal Opinion

Frank Lauria, in Appeal No. 97-1306 v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, in Appeal Nos. 97-1361/62/63

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 1998No. 97-1306, 97-1361, 97-1362, 97-1363PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Frank Lauria and two railyard co-workers were traversing the railroad tracks near Philadelphia’s 30th Street Station late one evening when Lauria slipped and injured himself. He sued his employer, Ap-pellee National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq., (“FELA”), claiming ,a workplace injury caused by Amtrak’s failure to provide a reasonably safe work environment. At trial, the district court refused to permit the admission of expert and lay opinion testimony, and at…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Karla Robinson v. Geico General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Oddi v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Kelvin FordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API