Carroll v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WHITE, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of obscenity under V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 43.23(c). The appellant pleaded not guilty and was tried and convicted by the trial court. The trial court found that the appellant, “knowing the content and character of the material, (did) intentionally sell to N.D. Wong obscene material, namely, a magazine entitled, ‘Super #3.’ ” 1 The trial court sentenced the appellant to 10 days confinement and a $500.00 fine.
On appeal the appellant argued that the evidence admitted…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Shealy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Lee v. Perez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Glass v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.