Gonzales v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appeal is taken from a conviction for obscenity. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court assessed punishment at 5 days and a $1,000.00 fine. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction. Gonzales v. State, 676 S.W.2d 437 (Tex.Ap.—Houston [1st] 1984). The reversal by the Court of Appeals was based on the holding that the trial court reversibly erred in submitting a charge to the jury on the presumption provided by V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 43.23(e). See Shealy v. State, 675 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.Cr.App.1984); Davis v. State,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Shealy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
4Cited by10 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Shealy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.