Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1985No. 952-84PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for obscenity. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court assessed punishment at 5 days and a $1,000.00 fine. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction. Gonzales v. State, 676 S.W.2d 437 (Tex.Ap.—Houston [1st] 1984). The reversal by the Court of Appeals was based on the holding that the trial court reversibly erred in submitting a charge to the jury on the presumption provided by V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 43.23(e). See Shealy v. State, 675 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.Cr.App.1984); Davis v. State,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Shealy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Shealy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API