Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2014No. Nos. 13-50315, 13-50316PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, James S. Davis appeals from the district court’s judgments revoking supervised release and the three-month, concurrent custodial sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Deedy v. SuzukiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  2. Abordo v. Federal Detention Center - HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
  3. Albert Lee Mitchell v. EnglemanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  4. Ana Karin Palacios-Bernal v. William P. BarrDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  5. Antonio Edior Pierre v. Merrick GarlandDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API