Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Hauschild
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1995No. 18702, 18703PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Jim Cooper (“Cooper”) appeals from a judgment quashing a Writ of Mandamus, arising from proceedings relating to his application to the Brookings City Commission (“City”) for a malt beverage license. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
On November 22, 1993, Cooper applied for a Uniform Alcoholic Beverage License to the City of Brookings. In his application, he requested a retail on/off sale malt beverage license for a business to be known as JD’s Casino located in Brookings. The Notice of Public Hearing on Application for Alcoholic Beverage License was published as required by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- McFarland v. BarronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Kostel Funeral Home, Inc. v. Duke Tufty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West Two Rivers Ranch v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Estate of PerrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Accounts Management, Inc. v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003