Lovejoy v. Town of Darien
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendant was authorized by statute to construct a sewer system. It laid its outfall pipe through the plaintiff’s oyster bed, destroying it and the oysters thereon. The question to be decided is whether the trial court was justified in awarding damages to the plaintiff.
The finding, with such corrections as the evidence requires, may be summarized as follows for the purposes of this appeal. The plaintiff is the owner of a franchise for the cultivation of oysters on approximately eight acres of land under the waters of Long Island Sound in the town of Darien. His rights were originally…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Haskell v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Harvey Textile Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Misisco v. La MaitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.