Legal Opinion

Andrew Leo Oksanen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1966No. 18131_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the United States District Court of North Dakota. The District Court granted appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside his sentence for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (Dyer Act), on the basis that appellant did not have counsel present at the time of original sentencing in 1955. The District Court, however, refused to set aside appellant’s plea of guilty and re-sentenced appellant to a term of three years, with sentence suspended on conditions of probation. Appellant seeks relief by appealing from this judgment.

The Government has questioned our…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Robert William Losieau v. Maurice H. Sigler, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Watson v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Maurice Anton Kienlen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Robert E. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API