Legal Opinion

Walyd ex rel. Walyd v. Kane

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 10, 1968No. Nos. 65-C-100, 65-C-101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs in these cases are Tabu Walyd and Mumtaz Walyd, the two minor sons of Khalyd Walyd who is named in the actions as their father and “next of friend.” They are suing two police officers of the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Michael S. Kane and Gerhard Buelow, for damages sustained when the officers allegedly deprived them of certain civil rights under color of law. The statutory authorization for such a suit is found in 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1343.

II. UNDISPUTED FACTS

The plaintiffs, Tabu and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Galloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. Rosemond v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. of Des MoinesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
  4. Thomas v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conklin v. BarfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API