Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boutwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1985No. 711-83 to 713-83Published

1ConcurrenceTeague, Judge

If nothing else, the majority opinion makes one thing clear: The waters regarding the admissibility of extraneous offenses have yet to be purified. They are still murky. Therefore, I only concur in the result.

On original submission, I only concurred in the result that the majority opinion by Judge Clinton reached, namely, that the trial court erred in admitting extraneous offenses into evidence during the guilt stage of the trial of Lester Boutwell, hereinafter referred to as the appellant. I did so because the opinion used too much paint on such a small issue that needed addressing in this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Plante v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API