Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Hellberg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court. — Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action by the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy, to recover the possession or the value of a certain stock of goods sold by the bankrupt to the defendant. There was a directed verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

— Under the allegations of the petition, the right of recovery is predicated upon two grounds:(1) That the defendant purchased the entire stock of goods of the bankrupt debtor in violation of the Bulk Sales statute, Chapter 64, Acts of the Thirty-seventh General Assembly.(2) That the purchase was made within four months prior to the adjudication of bankruptcy, and that it was void, as a preference, under the Federal bankruptcy law.

The verdict was directed on the first ground. Clearly, the evidence would not sustain a directed verdict on the second ground. We have need to deal, therefore, only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Des Moines Packing Co. v. UncaphorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Faeth Co. v. BressieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. State v. Eagle Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Englewood State Bank v. TegtmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Hronik v. WartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API