Legal Opinion

People v. Devaughn

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1923No. Crim. No. 997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was found guilty on a charge of grand larceny in taking personal property from the person of one Lindbloom. He has appealed from the judgment, as well as from the order of the court denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence shows that the prosecuting witness, Lind-bloom, was employed as a car-repairer in the yards of the Union Pacific Company in the city of Los Angeles; that on the fifth day of December, 1922, he finished his work at about 4 o’clock in the afternoon, when he started for a street-car to take him to his home; that before he got on the ear he took his pocketbook…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilder v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. Jesus O.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  5. People v. CrottyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API