Legal Opinion

Prime Properties Development Corp. v. Binns

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1990No. Nos. 3086 and 3087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

These are consolidated appeals by A. Stanley and Joan Adams,1 and Prime Properties Investment Corporation (PPIC) [No. 3086 Philadelphia 1989], and Robert Bachich *497[No. 3087 Philadelphia 1989], from an order which sustained the preliminary objections of additional defendant James Campbell on the basis of the untimely joinder of Campbell, and which dismissed the complaint against him as an additional defendant. The primary issue raised on appeal is whether the judge who sustained the preliminary objections of additional defendant Campbell to the late joinder had the authority to do…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zakian v. LILJESTRANDSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Reifinger v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Kovalesky v. Esther Williams Swimming PoolsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. NPW Medical Center of N.E. Penna., Inc. v. LS Design Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Riccobono v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bester v. Essex Crane Rental Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Kessock, J. v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Lawrence v. MeekerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Cherry v. Zucker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API