Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Kent

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1993No. S93A0615PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-524, appellant-contestant Johnny Hanson filed a pro se petition to contest the election of appellee-defendant Charles Kent to the office of Chairman of the Tift County Board of Commissioners. The trial court, after hearing the evidence without a jury, declared appellee to have been duly elected. Appellant appeals from that order of the trial court.

1. The trial court denied appellant’s motion for a continuance and this ruling is enumerated as error.

Appellant had requested a continuance in order “to prepare a proper case in this action.” The trial court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCorquodale v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Allen v. Cobb Heating & Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Johnson v. RheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Turpin v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Morrow v. Vineville United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Streeter v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Bandy v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Gravitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API