Legal Opinion

Langdon v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1972No. 3987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Parker

On October 7, 1964, William Matilainen, employed by Brasel & Sims Construction Company as a cement finisher, was seriously injured by a bucket of cement that dropped when the wire cable which held the crane boom came loose. His guardians sued Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation for $1,003,000, 1 alleging, inter alia, in their complaint:

“Defendant was negligent in the manufacture and design of the above-described machine [a Lima Type 44 crane] in that the cable was attached to the spool with a deadend device connection or attachment utilizing a socket and wedge, which said device is but 70…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Central Gas Company v. BloemWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Rafferty v. Northern Utilities Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Barber v. Sheridan Trust & Savings BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Short v. Spring Creek Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Caldwell v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Alberts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jivelekas v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API