Meyer v. Milliken
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland
The parties are before this court in the same order as in the trial court and reference will be made to them as plaintiff or Meyer, and defendants, or the latter will be mentioned by name, as Milliken, Transcontinental Oil Company, the Ohio Oil Company and Texas Production Company.
Prior to August 31, 1922, Meyer, now deceased, then a resident of Wyoming, procured an oil and gas pros pectixig permit from the United States G-overnment on lands in Moffat county, Colorado, known as the “Hamilton Dome” on which is located the “Moffat Pool.” On the above date the Transcontinental Oil Company, by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bartlett v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Meyer v. MillikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Meyer v. MillikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Meyer v. MillikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943