Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Milliken

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 10, 1943No. 15,052Published

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFF in error is hereinafter referred to as defendant and her deceased husband as Meyer. Defendant in error is referred to as plaintiff and her deceased husband as Milliken.

The county court entered a judgment allowing the claim of plaintiff against the uninventoried estate of Meyer. To review that judgment defendant prosecutes this writ and specifies five alleged errors. These are argued under three headings, i.e., (1) Plaintiff's claim was not properly exhibited; (2) the judgment is not supported by the evidence; (3) the uninventoried estate is not subject to the payment of the claim.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Smith v. WilkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. First National Bank v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Meyer v. MillikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Scholtz v. HazardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API