Legal Opinion

Debow v. Truax

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1926No. 20061. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— This is a mandamus proceeding. The only question involved is whether the petitioner, who is a county commissioner of Benton county and ex-officio commissioner of county roads within his district, is entitled to compensation for services performed in looking after such roads.

He was elected county commissioner while ch. 154, Laws of 1921, p. 580, and other laws which we shall incidentally mention, were in force. He still holds the office. Rem. Comp. Stat., §4200 [P. C. §1570], fixes the compensation of the county commissioners of the various counties of the state. In the more populous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mudgett v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Knowlton v. Mason CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McIntyre v. Whatcom CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API