Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foughty v. Friederich

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1961No. 7942PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The relator, Frank E. Foughty, presented to this court an application for leave to file an information in quo warranto, supported by the affidavit of the relator and a proposed information. The application and its supporting papers indicate that the relator, Foughty, claims to be entitled to the office of Judge of the Second Judicial District of the State of North Dakota which office is now in the possession of Ray R. Friederich whom we will refer to as the *683respondent and who claims to be the lawful incumbent of the office.

This Court issued its order, directed to Friederich, to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Erickson v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Gormley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  5. State Ex Rel. Lyons v. GuyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Angelini v. HardbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Representative Donald Turner, Jr. and Senator Joseph Benning v. Governor Peter ShumlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Marmon v. HodnyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Vogel v. GaraasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dickinson Newspapers, Inc. v. JorgensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API