Legal Opinion

Richley v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1974No. 73-606PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebeezze, J.

At the outset, this court must determine whether the decision in New Way Family Laundry v. Toledo (1960), 171 Ohio St. 242, applies to the facts herein. In that case, paragraph three of the syllabus held that:

“The construction of a divider strip in the middle of a highway resulting in the elimination of left turns from and into the abutting property and thereby permitting only light turns and requiring circuity of travel to leave or reach the opposite half of the highway does not constitute-an actionable interference with the' abutting property owner’s right of ingress and egress.”

*66Although…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ENSLEYIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Painter v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hurst v. StarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Wayne Watson Enterprises, LLC v. City of CambridgeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  5. State ex rel. Duncan v. Am. Transm. Sys., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API