State Bank of Chicago v. Gross
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr
By the sixth section of the will of Minnie Schmidt the testatrix created a $25,000 trust for her grand-daughter, Wilhelmina Gross, defendant in error. The testatrix there directed her executor, the State Bank of Chicago, plaintiff in error, to pay this sum of money to the State Bank of Chicago as trustee, “to have and to hold the same upon the trust and for the uses and purposes hereinabove expressed.” After authorizing the trustee to invest and reinvest the trust funds, the paragraph in question provides: “After paying all necessary and proper expenses incurred by said trustee in the care…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kent v. DunhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Edwards v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Welch v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Poole v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Feder v. LusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Williams v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Northern Trust Co. v. Winona Lake School of TheologyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.