Legal Opinion

Emporium Capwell Co. v. Anglim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1944No. 10423PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case, as stipulated by the parties and found by the lower court, are undisputed. The appellant taxpayer, the Emporium Capwell Company, a California corporation, and the Emporium Cap-well Corporation, a Delaware corporation, in accordance with the laws of the States of California and Delaware, respectively, on December 22, 1939 entered into an agreement of merger whereby the Emporium Capwell Corporation was extinguished and the Emporium Capwell Company became the surviving corporation.

In order to effect this merger the laws of both states required a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Merchants Nat. Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Koppers Coal & Transportation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. Seattle-First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  5. Niagara Hudson Power Corporation v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. North American Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Helfand v. GambeeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  3. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. Helfand v. GambeeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API