Legal Opinion

United States v. Seattle-First Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1943No. 10254PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The question presented here is whether a statutory consolidation of banks under the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 34a, involves liability for documentary stamp tax under § 800 and Schedules A-3, A-8, and A-9, Title VIII, Revenue Act of 1926, as amended, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, pages 284, 289, 297.

In 1935 a state bank, the Spokane and Eastern Trust Company, consolidated with the First National Bank of Seattle under the name of Seattle-First National Bank. Upon the ratification of the consolidation agreement by the stockholders the comptroller of the currency issued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Merchants Nat. Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. State Street Trust Co. v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Seattle-First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Kurio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  3. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Cooper Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  5. Emporium Capwell Co. v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API