Legal Opinion

Crociata v. State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mahoney, P. J.

Petitioners are residents in proprietary adult homes which, for a monthly charge deducted from the residents’ public funds, provide room and board and other personal care services (see, Social Services Law § 2 [25], [27]; § 461 et seq.). In 1981, petitioners applied for a real property tax "circuit breaker” credit pursuant to Tax Law § 606 (e), which provides to low-income homeowners and renters a credit for a portion of real property taxes paid. The maximum amount of the credit allowable in 1981 was $45 (Tax Law § 606 [e] [3] [ii]). For 1981, all but one of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. TaubAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
  2. Crociata v. State Tax CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duffy v. WetzlerNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Duffy v. WetzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Crociata v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API