Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Taub

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 11, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered July 16, 1984, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $10 costs; the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petitions in these consolidated proceedings is denied and the petitions are thus reinstated; the petitioners’ cross motion to dismiss the first and third affirmative defense and second counterclaim and to strike respondents’ jury demand is granted; and the matter is remanded to the Civil Court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Petitioner Yolanda Fischer, Robert Fish, Henry Rausman, Anita Milch and Simon Abikhzen, collectively known as the…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Town of Red HookNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Robin v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crociata v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. 2009-2011 Third Avenue Corp. v. Fifth Avenue Community Center of Harlem, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
  3. Carrier v. Salvation ArmyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Oceanview Manor Home for Adults v. VargasCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016
  5. Westbury Senior Living, Inc. v. ClementsNassau County District Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API