North Pacific Insurance v. Christensen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
In this case, we must determine whether a passenger who causes an accident by unexpectedly grabbing the steering wheel of a motor vehicle is the operator of that vehicle for purposes of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. We hold that, under the facts of this case, the passenger assumed physical control of the vehicle. Therefore, the passenger was the operator of the vehicle for purposes of the UIM provisions of this particular policy.
FACTS
Robert Christensen, a 16-year-old student, was driving his family’s car in traffic when Christensen’s high school friend, Christopher Chase, reached over…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- North Pacific Ins. Co. v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Getz v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Le v. VakninSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.