Legal Opinion
Patrick v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 23, 2015No. 14-cv-3658PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HON. RONALD A. GUZMAN, United States District Judge.
Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration [72] is granted in part and denied in part. Count I of Plaintiffs complaint is hereby reinstated. Count III remains dismissed, but this dismissal is modified to be without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order.
STATEMENT
On December 17, 2014, the Court granted in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss. (Dkt.# 66.) As relevant here, the Court dismissed Counts I and III of Plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff now moves for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Birdo v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Boyd v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Wrice v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.